Neuralbet Review

I have quit using the software until my bankroll recovers for another go.

I'm running well at poker and okay at tennis so no problem but neuralbet would have wiped me out.

300 bets should be enough to be a guide as to profitability, I would have liked to have 1000 bets but my roll won't stand it.

I reckon neuralbet has cost me but only say $250 + plus the $399 the effing software cost. I will have another go when my roll has recovered.

I have now seen that my blog has made it into the search area of neuralbet. I will give more info.

I bought Neuralbet for Scooer, US Football and Baseball.

For your info I am a small stakes gambler. My theory is to bet many times on selected events where I have a small edge. I love the idea of using computers to beat Sports betting. Hey that's how the bigtime pros do it right?

The software is just a click of a button job, you fire it up and it will churn out the picks for the day.

The problem that I have with it is that it only gives you the figure, not the data behind it.

I use the On court software to cap tennis matches with great success and Neuralbet seemed like an extension of that. I have also made a killing playing internet poker so I know my way around internet gambling. I am a steady winner, my hope in a few years is to grow my bankroll and make some serious money.

The image from above has 82 baseball bets($190 loss) and 56 soccer bets(150 loss) with just 8 Us football bets for a miniscule profit.

I lost over $300 due to Neuralbet on Betfair alone, it's predictions were just so bad that if I had flipped a coin choosing heads for one side and tails for the other I would have fared better.

I have put on 250 or so bets with a $400 loss, my roll is only just starting to recover since I stopped using it about 4 weeks ago.

My belief is that it has been invented by the bookies to get some revenge over the computer whizzes that have been having their pants down for years!

The above figure represents a fairly flat staking system with only small ajustment made if I had a reasonable edge on the bet.

I do realise that my sample of bets is small and that variance could have affected me however a trial of 250-300 bets should show if a system is profitable, Neuralbet unfortunately is not.